For the complete documentation index, see llms.txt. This page is also available as Markdown.

Terms: Validation, Correction, Verification

The trust and correction vocabulary used across Agri Stack registries: validation, change, correction, void, approval of changes, verification and dispute.

The registry's job is that its records are authentic, and verified where that is needed. Whether a programme will act on a record (approval for payment or eligibility) is decided in PBMS, not here.

These terms apply to both record kinds: entity registers (a farmer, a plot) and activity registers, whose records are occurrences (a sowing, a vaccination). See activity register.

Term
What it means
What happens to the data
Entity register
Activity register

Validation

Automatic checks at entry: format, required fields, reference data, plausibility

Bad input is rejected or warned on; nothing is stored about it

Built

Built

Change

The world changed: the farmer moved, got a new phone, sold a plot

New version; the old value stays in history as true at that time

Change request

Doesn't apply: an occurrence never changes; a new event is a new activity

Correction

The record was wrong: a typo, a mis-measured area

New version; the old value is marked as an error, never true

Change request today, not marked as a correction; marking it, with a reason, is proposed (phase 2)

Supersede, with a reason

Void

The record shouldn't exist: a duplicate, an event that never happened

Kept, but no longer counts

Record status (e.g. deactivated)

Void, with a reason

Approval (of a change)

A supervisor authorises a change or correction before it enters the register

Governs who may change data; says nothing about whether it is true

AWE on change requests, as built

Not needed: appends and corrections are governed by permissions and rules

Verification

An independent check that recorded data matches reality or an authoritative source: a field visit, a document, a national ID lookup, a trusted device

Never changes the data. Adds a trust status (verified, failed or pending), with who checked, how and with what evidence

Proposed (phase 2); today a verification tied to a change request

Built as a single step (verify or reject); moves onto the common model

Dispute

The person concerned says a record is wrong

Triggers verification, then a correction if the claim holds

Proposed (phase 2)

Proposed (phase 2)

How they relate:

  • Verification is about truth; approval is about authority to change. Both can apply to the same data.

  • A change or correction resets the verification of what it touched: new data hasn't been checked.

  • A failed verification leads to a correction or a void; it never edits the data itself.

The common verification and correction model for both kinds (verification policies, records and status, corrections marked as such, disputes) is proposed, not built: see Verification and Correction (Proposal).

Last updated

Was this helpful?