Terms: Validation, Correction, Verification
The trust and correction vocabulary used across Agri Stack registries: validation, change, correction, void, approval of changes, verification and dispute.
The registry's job is that its records are authentic, and verified where that is needed. Whether a programme will act on a record (approval for payment or eligibility) is decided in PBMS, not here.
These terms apply to both record kinds: entity registers (a farmer, a plot) and activity registers, whose records are occurrences (a sowing, a vaccination). See activity register.
Validation
Automatic checks at entry: format, required fields, reference data, plausibility
Bad input is rejected or warned on; nothing is stored about it
Built
Built
Change
The world changed: the farmer moved, got a new phone, sold a plot
New version; the old value stays in history as true at that time
Change request
Doesn't apply: an occurrence never changes; a new event is a new activity
Correction
The record was wrong: a typo, a mis-measured area
New version; the old value is marked as an error, never true
Change request today, not marked as a correction; marking it, with a reason, is proposed (phase 2)
Supersede, with a reason
Void
The record shouldn't exist: a duplicate, an event that never happened
Kept, but no longer counts
Record status (e.g. deactivated)
Void, with a reason
Approval (of a change)
A supervisor authorises a change or correction before it enters the register
Governs who may change data; says nothing about whether it is true
AWE on change requests, as built
Not needed: appends and corrections are governed by permissions and rules
Verification
An independent check that recorded data matches reality or an authoritative source: a field visit, a document, a national ID lookup, a trusted device
Never changes the data. Adds a trust status (verified, failed or pending), with who checked, how and with what evidence
Proposed (phase 2); today a verification tied to a change request
Built as a single step (verify or reject); moves onto the common model
Dispute
The person concerned says a record is wrong
Triggers verification, then a correction if the claim holds
Proposed (phase 2)
Proposed (phase 2)
How they relate:
Verification is about truth; approval is about authority to change. Both can apply to the same data.
A change or correction resets the verification of what it touched: new data hasn't been checked.
A failed verification leads to a correction or a void; it never edits the data itself.
The common verification and correction model for both kinds (verification policies, records and status, corrections marked as such, disputes) is proposed, not built: see Verification and Correction (Proposal).
Last updated
Was this helpful?